Esteemed cinematographer Benoît Delhomme’s credits have included a conspicuous number of thoughtful, visually sumptuous period pieces, such as The Talented Mr. Ripley, The Theory of Everything and Lady Chatterley’s Lover, as well as a few films made to promote fashion brands like Balmain, Dior and Chanel. In a way, that résumé partially explains why he might have been inclined to make his directorial debut with Mothers’ Instinct, for which he also serves as the DP.

This pulpy, psychologically shallow and yet beautifully shot period thriller is all about two soignée suburban housewives – played by Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway – who spend the film’s 96 minutes suffering, scheming and losing their minds while wearing immaculate vintage-inspired costumes. Ultimately, the characters’ motivations, like their titular instinct, are weakly delineated in this remake of a 2018 Belgian film.

Here are the basics: Homemakers Alice (Chastain, wearing Kim Novak’s hair from Vertigo) and Celine (Hathaway, in Jackie Kennedy drag) live next door to each other in almost-matching clapboard houses in an unnamed town. Best friends, the two women carpool together to ferry their same-aged sons – Alice’s Theo (Eamon Patrick O’Connell) and Celine’s Max (Baylen D. Bielitz) – back and forth to the local elementary school. On weekends, the ladies make up a convivial foursome with their husbands, Celine’s pharmaceutical salesman Darren (Josh Charles) and Alice’s Simon (Anders Danielsen Lie), who is so boring and effectively inconsequential to the story we barely get to find out what he does for a living. A journalist, perhaps? Something along those lines, given that at one point it’s mentioned that Alice used to be a reporter before she settled down to a life of domestic bliss.

Of course, there are tiny fractures in both marriages, barely visible on the surface, which end up shattering this little suburban Eden. It starts when the boys come home with bird boxes they’ve made at school and Max ends up falling off the balcony below his window to his death when he tries to hang it in the tree, proof that no good can come from handicrafts. Alice sees the disaster just before it happens from her garden and is running up the stairs to try to stop him but doesn’t make it in time. Prone to guilt because of the tragic death of her parents when she was a child in a car accident that she alone survived, Alice is distraught, of course. But not as distraught as Celine, who blames herself for not having kept an eye on her child every moment of the day; she was busy vacuuming when the accident happened, proving no good can come from housecleaning.

Celine goes away in a car, presumably to some kind of mental hospital, and comes back a month later, apparently quite chipper and ready to get on with life as best she can, since she can never have another child. “Something was broken inside me,” she explains to Theo coyly when he asks why she can’t have more kids. But Celine is at least able to do things like visit the boys’ school, much to the shock and horror of Alice, who, like the two husbands and Simon’s bitchy mother, Jean (Caroline Lagerfelt), seems to think she should avoid anything that might remind her of Max. Obviously, this is not an approach to grief that any modern therapist would endorse, which just goes to show how much Alice, for all her talk about going back to work and her tendency to show her knowledge of history, has internalised the stifling attitudes of the time.

From here on out, Sarah Conradt’s script starts shuffling the coconut half shells around the table, suggesting that maybe it’s Alice, who admits to having spent time in an institution for depression, who’s losing her sanity. She becomes convinced that Celine, offended by something Jean said to her, killed the old woman by hiding her heart medication, and that she even has evil intent toward Theo, who is allergic to peanuts and ends up eating a carelessly left-out cookie he finds in Celine’s kitchen.

The film’s ultimate point seems to be that motherhood and suburbia drive everyone mad, but it’s not quite the progressive message the film seems to think it’s delivering. Or maybe there’s no message intended here and the whole exercise was just an excuse to allow friends Anne and Jessica to play dress-up for a few weeks.